Your weekly dose of legal absurdity, courtroom chaos, and mandatory fun, now with extra billable hours. Let's get into it! ⚖️😂
Welcome to our Monthly Celebrity Roast where legal meets lethal (but in a fun, defamation-free way). Alan Dershowitz, the Harvard emeritus who's turned losing lawsuits into performance art, is getting roasted harder than his reputation after defending every controversial client since the Scopes Monkey Trial.
Brace for a roast so brutal it'll leave you wheezing harder than Dershowitz explaining why his underwear stays on during massages.
🔥 The Defamation Disaster: Dershowitz lost his CNN defamation case faster than his credibility during the Epstein years. The 11th Circuit basically said "even if CNN lied about you, you can't prove they meant to." That's not legal vindication, Alan - that's judicial pity!
🔥 The Impeachment Innovator: During Trump's 2020 impeachment trial, Dershowitz argued that presidents can abuse power if they think it helps them get elected "in the public interest." That's not constitutional law - that's the Narcissist's Guide to Democracy. Next up: "Murder is legal if you really believe the victim deserved it."
🔥 The Sullivan Slayer: Now he's promising to take his losing streak to the Supreme Court to overturn New York Times v. Sullivan because it makes "lying journalists immune." Translation: "I can't win defamation cases under current law, so let's change the law!" That's not legal strategy - that's sore loser syndrome with a Harvard degree.
🔥 The Client Collection Catastrophe: Dershowitz's client roster reads like a "Who's Who of People You Don't Want at Thanksgiving Dinner." From O.J. Simpson to Jeffrey Epstein - he's basically the legal equivalent of a crisis management firm, except the crises never actually get managed.
🔥 The Martha's Vineyard Martyr: After the Epstein association, Dershowitz complained about being shunned at Martha's Vineyard dinner parties. Imagine being so toxic that even hedge fund managers avoid you at charity galas. That takes real talent!
🔥 The Age-Defying Appeal Machine: At 86, most lawyers are enjoying retirement and grandchildren. Not our Alan! He's still filing appeals and threatening to take cases to the Supreme Court like he's collecting legal trading cards. Someone should tell him that losing cases isn't a competitive sport.
🔥 The Underwear Defense Pioneer: Dershowitz once argued he couldn't have done anything inappropriate with Jeffrey Epstein's victims because he "kept his underwear on during massages." That's not a legal defense - that's what happens when your brain short-circuits under pressure and starts oversharing.
🔥 The Harvard Has-Been: From prestigious constitutional law professor to CNN lawsuit casualty - it's like watching someone trade a Rolls-Royce for a broken shopping cart. Even Judge Barbara Lagoa felt sorry for him, writing that the "only thing standing between Dershowitz and justice is Sullivan." That's judicial sympathy, not legal validation!
Final Verdict: Dershowitz's legal crusade has turned him into the most persistent loser since someone tried to patent the concept of breathing. This constitutional contrarian's next move? Probably suing the roast industry for calling this a "roast" when no actual heat was applied to meat products. Stay tuned for the Supreme Court appeal!
Disclaimer: No Harvard degrees were harmed in this roast, though several legal reputations took a beating. All zingers are satirical (unlike his 500+ media appearances). Alan, if you're reading this, we kept our underwear on while writing it.
PS: If this is your predilection, check out previously published roasts (Rudy Giuliani, Tom Goldstein, Alex Spiro, Spencer Sheehan, Alina Habba) in our Celebrity Roasts collection.
Still manually checking 47 URLs, screenshots, and PDFs for that one piece of evidence your client swore "was there yesterday"?
Meet your new discovery sidekick: Browse AI - your AI-powered web automation intern (minus the lunch breaks and typo-laced Slack messages).
• Monitor web pages
• Extract content
• Archive evidence
• Never blink
It's like having a junior associate with zero ego and a perfect memory.
Turn discovery from drudgery to done.
TRY IT NOW
Let's talk about the beautiful disaster that is the gap between law school fantasy and legal practice reality.
Law schools sell you on becoming the next Atticus Finch, standing before juries delivering passionate speeches about justice and constitutional principles. Reality check: you're going to spend three years arguing about whether "include" means "include but not limited to" in a software licensing agreement while slowly dying inside.
Here's the magnificent trainwreck of expectations versus reality:
Constitutional Law Dreams vs. Document Production Nightmares: They told us we'd be constitutional scholars debating the First Amendment and due process. Instead, we're warriors in the endless battle of document discovery, fighting over whether "responsive documents" includes that PowerPoint from 2019 that nobody can find. Your law review note on substantive due process? Useless. Your ability to craft a privilege log? Priceless.
Dramatic Closing Arguments vs. "Please Approve This Merger": Law school convinced us we'd deliver stirring courtroom speeches that would make juries weep and judges applaud. M&A lawyers spend their days writing memos about representations and warranties while praying the deal doesn't die in due diligence. The closest thing to a dramatic closing argument is explaining to a client why their acquisition just got torpedoed by environmental liabilities they forgot to mention.
Ethics Class vs. Billable Hour Pressure: Remember those noble discussions about zealous advocacy and moral obligations? Corporate associates quickly learn that "zealous advocacy" means billing 2,400 hours annually while maintaining the pretense that reviewing contracts at 2 AM is intellectually fulfilling. Ethics become "how much can I bill for this research without getting fired?"
Trial Advocacy vs. Settlement Negotiations: They taught us cross-examination techniques and courtroom procedure. Most lawyers will never see the inside of a courtroom that isn't handling traffic violations. Instead, we master the art of the settlement conference, where victory means convincing your client that accepting 60% of their demand is actually a win.
Legal Writing vs. CYA Email Composition: Law school writing focused on persuasive briefs and analytical memos. Real legal practice is 90% writing emails that protect you from malpractice claims while avoiding any definitive legal advice. "Based on our preliminary review of the limited information provided, it appears that additional analysis may be warranted" becomes your signature phrase.
International Law vs. State Compliance Issues: They made international law sound glamorous - treaties, diplomatic relations, global justice. Real international lawyers spend their time helping multinational corporations navigate tax avoidance schemes and explaining why their subsidiary in the Cayman Islands definitely isn't a shell company.
(For solo attorneys building their brand)
You went solo to be your own boss, not your own IT department.
GetResponse makes it easy to send polished, professional emails that turn contacts into clients (and clients into referrals who still open your emails a year later).
1. Build your own email list
2. Launch automated follow-ups
3. Promote your wins without sounding like a wedding planner
You're not just practicing law - you're building a brand.
Try it today | No credit card required | Cancel anytime
Start 30-day FREE trial
Criminal Law Heroes vs. Plea Bargain Assembly Line: Criminal law classes featured passionate defenders fighting wrongful convictions. Public defenders handle 100+ cases simultaneously, meeting clients for the first time at arraignment and negotiating plea deals in courthouse hallways. Justice is whatever keeps the system moving.
The Socratic Method vs. Partner Review Comments: Law professors challenged us with probing questions designed to sharpen our analytical thinking. Partners review your work with comments like "this sucks, redo it" or "why did this take you 8 hours?" The Socratic method becomes "guess what the partner wants before they get mad."
Pro Bono Glory vs. Compliance Training: They emphasized our professional obligation to serve the public good through pro bono work. Reality: you'll spend more time on mandatory compliance training about money laundering and conflicts of interest than helping actual human beings with legal problems.
Legal Research Mastery vs. Google Scholar Panic: Law school taught sophisticated research methodologies using Westlaw and Lexis. Practice reality: frantically Googling "is this actually illegal" at midnight while hoping your malpractice insurance is current.
The beautiful irony? Law school prepares you for a profession that barely exists anymore. They're training gladiators for an arena that's been converted into a document review warehouse. Most legal work is now process management disguised as intellectual analysis.
Professional survival tip: Embrace the bureaucracy. Learn to find meaning in the mundane. Master the art of making contract review sound intellectually stimulating during family dinners. And remember - somewhere, there's a law student reading about landmark constitutional cases while you're billing time for reviewing insurance policy definitions.
Motion to require law schools to teach "Advanced Disappointment Management" as a required course - granted with extreme prejudice.
Objection? Hit reply and argue your case!
Your inbox is full of legal briefs and client rants. Let Legal LOLz be the newsletter you actually look forward to reading.
P.S. This newsletter is 100% billable if you read it on the clock. Just saying.
© 2025 All rights reserved. Sharing is cool. Stealing? That's a tort, not a tribute.